At some point, most parents have tired punishment. Time-outs, raised voices, consequences, or removal of privileges are often used because parents feel desperate, tired, or unsure what else to do.
The issue is not that parents are acting improperly. The problem is that punishment alone does not teach children the skills they are missing.
Why Punishment Falls Short?
Punishment focuses on stopping behaviour, not understanding it. It assumes that children already know how to behave differently and are choosing not to.
This is frequently not the case, according to research, particularly for children with special needs.
Punishment:
- Temporarily, but not permanently, stop the behaviour
- Does not teach coping or communication skills
- Can increase fear, anxiety, or emotional shutdown
- Can weaken the trust between parent and child
Punishment may actually worsen behaviour in certain children, resulting in retreat, escalation, or recurring conflict cycles.
What PBS Does Differently?
PBS begins with the knowledge that there is a reason for problematic behaviour. A child can be attempting to:
- Escape from a challenging task
- Gain attention
- Manage sensory overload
- Express feelings they are yet unable to control
Instead of reacting after behaviour happens, PBS focuses on prevention and teaching.
Parents using PBS ask:
- What happens before this behaviour starts?
- What does my child gain or avoid by acting this way?
- What skill does my child need help developing?
- What are the underlying issues?
- What is my child trying to say?
Educating Instead of Punishing
PBS promotes and encourages proactive strategies, such as:
- Preparing children for transitions
- Offering choices to boost a feeling of control
- Teaching calming strategies before emotions explode
- Reinforcing positive behaviour immediately and clearly
When challenging behaviour does occur, PBS recommends gentle, least-restrictive responses to help the child regain control instead of making them feel punished or guilty.
This might look like:
- Reducing expectations during emotional overload
- Providing space and assurance
- Redirecting rather than escalating the situation
- Provide more time for the child to regulate their emotions
Benefits for Families in the Long Run
Research consistently show that PBS leads to:
- Reduced behavioural incidents
- Improved in emotional regulation
- Strengthening the parent-child relationships
- Increased self-assurance and independence in children
PBS does not guarantee quick solutions. It offers something better: lasting change built on understanding, consistency, and skill development.
A Gentler, More Effective Approach
Choosing PBS does not mean giving up boundaries. It means setting boundaries while also teaching children how to meet expectations successfully.
When parents shift from punishment to support, children learn not just how to behave, but how to cope, communicate, and thrive.
And that make things a little easier for the whole family.
References
Allen, D., McGill, P., Hastings, R., Toogood, S., Baker, P., Gore, N., & Hughes, J.C. (2013). Implementing positive behavioural support: Changing social and organisational contexts. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support, 3(2), 32-41.
Brandt, R. C. Chitiyo, M. & May, M. E. (2014). Measures used in assessing outcomes of school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 14(4), 229-238.
Carr, E. G. & Horner, R. H. (2007). The expanding vision of positive behavior support: research perspectives on happiness, helpfulness, hopefulness. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 3-14.
Chitiyo, M., & Wheeler, J. J. (2009). Challenges faced by schoolteachers in implementing positive behavior supporting their school systems. Remedial and Special Education, 30(1), 58-63.
Curwin, R. L., Mendler, A. N. & Mendler, B. D. (2008). Discipline with Dignity: New Challenges, New Solutions. Alexandria: ASCD.
Eber, L., Esperanza, J., Horner, R. H., Nakasato, J., Smolkowski, K., Sugai, G., et al. (2009). “A Randomized, Wait-List Controlled Effectiveness Trial Assessing School-Wide Positive Behavior Support in Elementary Schools.” Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11 (3), 133-144.
Fallon, L. M., McCarthy, S. R., & Sanetti, L. M. H. (2014). School-wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) in the classroom: Assessing perceived challenges to consistent implementation in Connecticut schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(1), 1-24.
Goh, A. E. & Bambara, L. M. (2012). Individualized positive behavior support in school settings: a meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 271-286.
Gore, N.J., McGill, P., Toogood, S., Allen, D., Hughes, J.C., Baker, P., Hastings, R.P., Noone, S.J. & Denne, L.D. (2013). Definition and scope for positive behavioural support. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support, 3 (2),14-23.
Hieneman, M. (2015). Positive behavior support for individuals with behavior challenges. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 101-108.
Horner, R., Sugai, G., Eber, L. & Lewandowski, H. (2004). Illinois Positive Behavior Interventions and Support Project: 2003-2004 Progress Report. University of Oregon: Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support & Illinois State Board of Education
Jarmolowicz, D. & Tetreault, A. (2015). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support as Behavior Analysis in Practice: Why Is This Even Controversial? Behav. Anal. Pract 8(1), 86-87.
Lefrancois, G.R. (2006). Theories of human learning: What the old woman said. Alberta: Thomson Wadsworth.
Muscott, H., Mann, E. & LeBrun, M. (2008). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in New Hampshire; Effects of Large-Scale Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support on Student Discipline and Academic Achievement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 189-205.
Ockenden, J. Ashman, B. & Beadle-Brown, J. (2014). Active Support: Fundamental to Positive Behaviour Support, Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(2), 98-107.
Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) Coalition. (2015). Positive Behavioural Support: A Competence Framework. London: PBS Coalition UK.
Putnam, R., Horner, R. & Algozzine, R. Academic Achievement and the Implementation of School-wide Behavior Support. PBIS Newsletter 3 (1). Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/pbis_newsletter/volume_3/issue4.aspx
Scott, T., Park, K., Swain-Bradway, J., & Landers, E. (2007). Positive Behavior Support in the Classroom: Facilitating Behaviorally Inclusive Learning Environments. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 3(2), 223-235.
Simonsen, B., Eber, L., Black, A., Sugai, G., Lewandowski, H., Myers, D., & Sims, B. (2011). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in Illinois: Lessons learned for large-scale implementation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 5-16.
Staab, S., & Karge, B. (2009). School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Perspectives on Practice at Danbrook Elementary School, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223-237.
Sugai, G. & Simonsen, B. (2012). Positive behavioral interventions and supports: history, defining features, and misconceptions. Retrieved from http://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Special-Education-Services/Documents/PBIS/2016-17/PBIS%20and%20the%20Link%20to%20Student%20Achievement.pdf
Warren, J. S., Edmonson, H. M., Griggs, P., Lassen, S. R., McCart, A., Turnbull, A., & Sailor, W. (2003). Urban applications of school-wide positive behavior support: Critical issues and lessons learned. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(2), 80-91.